SENIOR FIGURES affiliated with America-Israel Public Affairs Committee, known better as AIPAC, are preparing to launch a new political group called Pro-Israel America to steer smaller-dollar political donations toward pro-Israel candidates, according to a February strategy document obtained by HuffPost and Jewish Currents.
Pro-Israel America hopes to recruit 10,000 donors giving around $200 each in order to send at least $2 million to pro-Israel candidates during the 2020 campaign cycle. AIPAC has no obvious formal ties to Pro-Israel America, but the new group’s executive director, Jeff Mendelsohn, served as AIPAC’s director of outreach from 2005 to 2016. The group’s organizers plan to unveil it at AIPAC’s Policy Conference later this month, according to the strategy document.
Alongside the recently announced Democratic Majority for Israel — which plans to set up a PAC for campaign donations later this year and is also stocked with friends of AIPAC — the launch of Pro-Israel America marks a new phase of activism for the Israel lobby as it aims to remake itself for a new era in which progressive politicians have raised huge sums from small-dollar donors.
AIPAC and its allies had to make a change. Democratic voters are drifting from previously staunch support for the Israeli government, according to public opinion surveys, and recent left-wing electoral victories indicate a sea change on Israel within the Democratic Party itself. People who “do not value the U.S.-Israel relationship in the same way are becoming more organized and have new outlets for their contrary viewpoints,” the document’s authors warn. The Israel lobby’s turn toward small-dollar donations represents an acknowledgement of this changed political reality.
“Pro-Israel giving isn’t just for major donors and grass tops,” the document’s authors argue. “The majority of Americans support a close relationship with Israel, but most of them do not currently have easy access to opportunities for sustained pro-Israel political giving.” Pro-Israel America, the organizers promise, will “complement existing efforts” and open up pro-Israel politics to “tens of thousands of pro-Israel Americans,” increasing pro-Israel political giving by “millions of dollars.”
Groups as diverse as Christians United For Israel, the Israeli American Coalition for Action, and the Zionist Organization of America already spend huge sums on pro-Israel lobbying and politics in the U.S. Pro-Israel donors spent over $22 million on lobbying and campaigns during the 2018 election cycle, the Guardian estimated in February.
AIPAC, the biggest organ of the pro-Israel movement in the U.S., raises around $100 million a year from its donors. It spends most of that money on activities like lobbying junkets to Israel for politicians rather than direct political contributions. AIPAC does not itself technically raise money for political candidates. But it operates a powerful and influential network of donors whose effective deployment of dollars has long been the envy of the Beltway. AIPAC offers these donors “exclusive membership benefits” for giving money to particular pro-Israel PACs or directly donating to preferred campaigns, as Sludge reported in February.
The document does not identify AIPAC as the organizing force behind Pro-Israel America. But it shares the same broad mission. And in addition to Mendelsohn, the former AIPAC outreach chief, the group’s founding board members also include Jonathan Missner, a Washington lawyer who previously led AIPAC’s national affairs office, and Emil Pitkin, the CEO of the political research firm GovPredict. The document suggests that at least four other staffers will be brought on board in the first year, in addition to “consultants who “will be retained as needed.”
“AIPAC doesn’t go around announcing other peoples’ initiatives at their conference,” said former AIPAC staffer and longtime Israel lobby watcher MJ Rosenberg. “These officials wouldn’t be doing this without them, they are just barely covering their involvement. They want deniability, but this isn’t much deniability.”
Pro-Israel America will endorse candidates, particularly when “pro-Israel members of Congress or candidates face competitive races and/or where one candidate is clearly more pro-Israel than the other,” according to the document. It will also create a web portal so donors can send contributions to specific campaigns.
The idea appears to be to expand the Israel lobby’s “political funding operations so it just doesn’t rely on millionaires and billionaires,” Rosenberg said. “They’re trying to get college kids involved, people who can only make a $25 contribution. It’s a way to get the kids, and the kids are more on the left, and AIPAC feels they are under attack on the left.”
Neither Mendelsohn of Pro-Israel America nor spokespersons for AIPAC replied to requests for comment.
Creating a group like Pro-Israel America represents a huge strategic shift for AIPAC. For years, AIPAC has been able to publicly put distance between itself and the large sums of money that pro-Israel donors marshal on behalf of preferred candidates. By supporting new groups like Pro-Israel America and the Democratic Majority For Israel (whose leadership is also replete with old AIPAC hands) — and giving them prime placement at its flagship conference — AIPAC is publicly linking itself to the kind of election cycle work it has long kept at arm’s length.
AIPAC and its allies now face direct political opposition on Israel policy they have not encountered for years, and backed by funding sources with which they have no influence. Those include high-profile new members of Congress like Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.). Omar was recently taken to task by the Democratic leadership for suggesting that AIPAC dollars were behind Republican zealousness to silence her, and will face a House vote on Wednesday brought by Democrats to condemn her.
Omar’s and Tlaib’s ascendancy within the Democratic Party, alongside Bernie Sanders and other progressives who reject bundled donor or corporate money, “challenges the entire structure on which AIPAC’s influence is based,” noted Lara Friedman, president of the Foundation for Middle East Peace, a left-leaning Washington-based think tank.
“This could certainly be successful,” Friedman said. “But let’s be clear: if AIPAC believes that a new group selling same old AIPAC hasbara is going to resonate with Americans who today are voting both with their ballots and their wallets to support candidates who are truly progressive — including when it comes to Israel-Palestine issues — then it suggests that AIPAC is out of touch or in denial about what is happening at the grassroots level in this country.”