You are now entering the Jewish Currents archive.
O My America: If We Each Had a Line-Item Veto
by Lawrence Bush
A question I’ve been contemplating lately, as I witnessed the ultra-democratic spirit of the Occupy movement:
If America were run on a referendum basis — every voter has a computer, and every policy decision that is currently handled by Congress would be decided instead by direct vote (Congress could formulate legislation, but direct vote would determine its fate) — how many progressives would feel comfortable with that?
Not a majority, I would guess. Because the results — manipulated by corporate monies, lobbied and corralled by wealthy interests, pumped up by Rush Limbaugh, preached about in the mega-churhces, with endless, endless campaigning for our votes — would probably be awful. As awful as the results our existing system produces, and a whole lot noisier.
Okay, what about this: a line-item veto for every tax-payer. We have to pay our taxes, but we get to indicate how the money gets spent. Somehow, I feel more comfortable with this, because I think the working majority would give less money to the military, more money to social and economic development, more money to health and education, more money to the environment . . .
But why do I feel distrustful about direct democracy for law-making, yet okay about it for tax-spending? Hmm . . .
What’s your opinion?
Meanwhile, here’s a link to a vivid presentation by Peter Kim of how our tax dollars are currently spent — and all of the social ills and failures that we suffer in spite of our spending.
I’m Arielle Angel, editor-at-large of Jewish Currents. Before you go, there’s something I need to ask.
We’ve seen over and over how the mainstream media falters in telling stories on our beats—whether it’s antisemitism, Israel/Palestine in American politics, Jewish identity, or the American left. At Jewish Currents we’re committed to uncompromising analysis and longform reporting on these issues and more—stories you won’t find anywhere else. In a media landscape that obscures injustice and flattens discussion, we’re changing the conversation. But we need you.
If you believe in this work, please consider making a donation—or even better, a recurring one—to ensure that we are able to keep publishing stories like this one. We can’t do it without you.
